MEDICAL
FRAUD and the criminal assault of boys
The Love Surgery: A Sex
Scandal
Re: Female circumcision without their
consent
Excerpts from CBS - West 57th October
29, 1988
BURNES:
Hi. Welcome to West 57th. I'm Karen Burns.
Our first story tonight involves a group of
women, a doctor, and a hospital. What happened to the women is extremely disturbing
and, in some cases, shocking. In order to tell their story, we and they have had
to use some clinical language, which may make you uncomfortable. But we have
done so because what happened to these women in Dayton, Ohio is something that
can happen to anyone. It's the story of a system that many believe has allowed a
doctor to harm- and in some cases, to shatter- lives.
The doctors is still in
practice, the hospital in business. And the women are devastated.
JOY MARTIN:
He shouldn't be walking the streets, let
alone having a scalpel in his hand.
JANET PHILLIPS:
I went to him for help. I didn't
want to be his guinea pig.
CHERYL SEXTON:
I feel like he created a new sex
organ for me, like he would for a man that had a sex change.
SANDY SCHOCKE: This man reminds me of someone that
did experimentation in Auschwitz. That was unchecked, and no one could stop
them.
DR. BRADLEY BUSACCO: I hate to use the term
"Frankenstein," but it's almost like were creating a new anatomy here,
and in order to do that, some are falling by the wayside.
BURNES:
Cheryl Sexton went to Dr. Burt in 1984 with
bladder problems. Janet Phillips complained of cramps and heavy bleeding when
she went to Burt in 1981. They expected Dr. Burt to perform surgery, but they
neither agreed to nor even imagined was that Dr. Burt would circumcise them.
....
MS. SEXTON:
I couldn't understand why he'd want to
do this. I mean, why would you circumcise a woman?
DR. BURT:
It's just snipping a little bit of skin,
really, and it has been reported to increase the sensitivity of the clitoris
in three out of four women. ...
DR. BURT:
Taking the little bit of skin off?
DR. BUSACCO: There is no reason from a sexual
standpoint that I know that would justify removing the prepuce.
BURNES: Dr.
Burt says that this is to make a woman more sensitive.
DR. BUSACCO: I'm certain it will make a woman
more sensitive, but I'm not certain that that's desirable.
MS. PHILLIPS:
The hood that's cut off from over
the clitoris is there for a reason, for protection. And it's easier for me to
understand how important that is because now mine is exposed. And to wear jeans,
if you get bumped there, if you're - during sex, foreplay - if you're touched
rough, it is very painful.
MS. SEXTON:
It does make you more sensitive at first,
you know. You can't even stand to wear pants. But you get to the point where,
you know, you lose all feelings there. I don't know how a castrated man feels, but I feel like, you know, he's
taken so much of my desire away. I feel like he's just taken everything from me.
.......
SANDY SHOCKEY:
If this weren't so sad I
would laugh at that . Who is he to say that he can improve upon what God made? I
did not ask this man to improve.
JOY MARTIN: (another victim) ... I feel like a real crime was committed. ...
SANDY SHOCKEY: It's
like a life sentence that was put on my head 19 years ago, that I can't shake.
Note: This is only a small excerpt
from West 57th aired in 1988. Dr. Bur is no longer practicing medicine.
If females had not exposed the circumcision fraud of females at this point -
doctors in North America would now be busy amputating the genitals of females.
The advocates of female circumcision would be publicizing the advantages of
female circumcision - with the aid of the media. FGM would have been a booming
business today.
We need to speak out against the
sexual predators who likewise circumcise males and spread their deviant reasons
for doing so. They likewise should be banned from practicing medicine. The
removal of the foreskin has the same effect as the removal of the clitoral
hood. So why did females object? Should they receive any more
consideration than they are prepared to give their boys?
This excerpt is quoted to
indicate how any female would react if she or her daughter were a victim of
unwanted circumcision. Unfortunately many females do not
understand that males have the same emotional feelings about their bodies as
females - and that if females resent the mutilation of their bodies - so do many
males. Are males born defective and need this defect corrected by surgery?
Why this "is something you do to a male but not to a female" defies
logic.
Unfortunately, males who are also
resentful of their unwanted circumcision are ridiculed into silence. As a group
of high school males so aptly stated: "Why should we respect the rights of
others when our own rights were so blatantly violated." MALES HAVE RIGHTS
TOO!