MEDICAL FRAUD and the criminal assault of boys
Circumcision of the Female
C.F. McDONALD M.D.
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
The infant clitoris is hidden, covered by the prepuce. The midline raphe may not open sufficiently in later life. A variety of symptoms can develop, attributable to accumulation and contamination of smegma. In these instances, the simple expedient of probing and cleansing can be rewarding.
WHEN WE WERE INTERNS, 33 years ago, the staffroom conversation one day came around to the clitoris of the female infant. As I remember, the sum total of knowledge of the subject among those present was zero. In the nursery I learned something I had not learned from school or from books, namely that the infant clitoris is hidden. The prepuce covers it at birth. The midline raphe invariably is intact.
When does the raphe open? Throughout the years, in practice, I found that it may remain intact even into late multiparous life. Also I have found that when the raphe does not open, smegma accumulation can cause trouble. Moreover, if the raphe opens only a pinpoint, bacteria can enter to cause contamination of the debris. This, then, can cause symptoms. If, at about two years of age, a little girls has not opened the raphe by exercises like riding kiddy-bikes, or by self examination, or if the raphe has not opened spontaneously, there usually is found an area of irritation. Then come the symptoms of irritation, scratching, irritability, masturbation, frequency and urgency. In adults, the same conditions exist, with associated smegmaliths that may cause dyspareunia and frigidity.
If the male needs circumcision for cleanliness and hygiene, why not the female? I have operated on perhaps 40 patients who needed this attention.
Illustrative Cases:
A youngster was suspected of having epilepsy. At about two years of age, she was brought to my office with the mother and was left alone while I examined the mother. I noticed the child masturbating by rubbing back and forth in a sitting position. She finally toppled over in hyperventilation. The disorder disappeared with the simple expedient of a female circumcision and the cleansing away of irritants.
Adult women with three or four children have seen whose chief complaint was dyspareunia. Examination revealed a rosary-like group of modules under the prepuce of a hidden clitoris. Female circumcision was done. Smegmaliths were cleansed away. Very thankful patients were the reward. For the first time in their lives, sex ambition became normally satisfied.
Most of the the patients have been children 2 to 10 years old who complained of signs and symptoms that suggested cystitis. Urine analyses were usually negative.
The mothers complained about the irritability of the children, their unusual habits and sometimes their bedwetting. When examination revealed the presence of a hidden or partially hidden clitoris, it was a simple procedure for the doctor to effect return to normality.
The Technique:
The procedure is easy, However, it is so distressing to the patient that general anesthetic should be used to avoid making an enemy for life. A blunt probe is inserted into the raphe and swung around the head of the clitoris. There is usually no bleeding, or at least very little.
The area is then cleansed of contaminated debris or of smegma that occasionally is formed into stones of various sizes. The raphe normally should be open in early childhood. It is seldom that the prepuce will overgrow again once it has been opened. The mother should be carefully instructed about teaching the child hygienic habits.
The signs and symptoms caused by contaminated smegma, retained smegma or smegmaliths usually clear up when the cause is removed. The same reasons that apply for the circumcision of males are generally valid when considered for the female.
GP Volume XVIII, Number 3
This article was written with the hope of encouraging female circumcision in America. Authors of most literature on child care who usually encourage circumcision of males, usually make reference to the fact that even females are circumcised.. This is obviously done to give male circumcision more credibility. However, they never state (for obvious reasons) that females consider circumcision cruel and barbaric, or that they are demanding an end to this and other forms of female genital mutilation in the world today. This is one of many deceitful strategies used by advocates of male circumcision.
- If circumcision of males facilitates male hygiene, would not female circumcision provide the same benefit?
- McDonald states: "The same reasons that apply for the circumcision of males are generally valid when considered for the female". If females refuse to be undergo genital mutilation - then why should males not have the right to retain their natural body. Obviously what is good for the gander should be good for the goose. Should it not?